Deciding Morality of Graphs is NP-complete
Tom S. Verma, Judea Pearl

TL;DR
Determining whether a graph can be represented as a DAG projection based on covariance data is computationally hard, being NP-complete, which impacts causal inference methods.
Contribution
This paper proves that deciding the existence of a DAG projection from covariance matrices is NP-complete, highlighting computational limitations in causal graph discovery.
Findings
Deciding DAG existence from covariance matrices is NP-complete.
The result impacts causal inference algorithms.
Highlights computational complexity in causal graph analysis.
Abstract
In order to find a causal explanation for data presented in the form of covariance and concentration matrices it is necessary to decide if the graph formed by such associations is a projection of a directed acyclic graph (dag). We show that the general problem of deciding whether such a dag exists is NP-complete.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Computational Drug Discovery Methods
