Trident pair production in a constant crossed field
B. King, H. Ruhl

TL;DR
This paper distinguishes between one-step and two-step mechanisms in trident pair production within a constant crossed field, showing how their relative importance varies with the quantum non-linearity parameter.
Contribution
It isolates and compares the one-step and two-step mechanisms, providing insights into their dominance depending on the quantum non-linearity parameter and field dimensions.
Findings
Two-step process aligns with polarised sub-process integration.
One-step process is suppressed at low to moderate parameters.
At high parameters, both channels are comparable if field size is limited.
Abstract
We isolate the two-step mechanism involving a real intermediate photon from the one-step mechanism involving a virtual photon for the trident process in a constant crossed field. The two-step process is shown to agree with an integration over polarised sub-processes. At low to moderate quantum non-linearity parameter, the one-step process is found to be suppressed. When the parameter is large, the two decay channels are comparable if the field dimensions are not much greater than the formation length.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
