Synchrotron and inverse-Compton emission from blazar jets - III. Compton-dominant blazars
William J. Potter, Garret Cotter

TL;DR
This study models the multi-wavelength spectra of six Compton-dominant blazars using an extended jet model, revealing the importance of jet geometry, equipartition, and high Lorentz factors in explaining their emission characteristics.
Contribution
It introduces a detailed jet model with a parabolic to conical transition, explaining the radio synchrotron break and inverse-Compton emission in blazars, and proposes a new interpretation of the blazar sequence.
Findings
Jet transition to equipartition occurs at large distances (~10^5 Schwarzschild radii).
A parabolic-to-conical jet model fits the multiwavelength data well.
High bulk Lorentz factors and jet power are necessary to reproduce observed Compton dominance.
Abstract
In this paper we develop the extended jet model of Potter & Cotter to model the simultaneous multi-wavelength spectra of six Compton-dominant blazars. We include an accelerating parabolic base transitioning to a slowly decelerating conical jet with a geometry set by observations of M87 and consistent with simulations and theory. We investigate several jet models and find that the optically thick to thin synchrotron break in the radio spectrum requires the jet to first come into equipartition at large distances along the jet (10^5 Schwarzschild radii), consistent with the observed transition from parabolic to conical in the jet of M87. We confirm this result analytically and calculate the expected frequency core-shift relations for the models under consideration. We find that a parabolic jet transitioning to a ballistic conical jet, which starts in equipartition and becomes more particle…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
