The metals-to-dust ratio to very low metallicities using GRB and QSO absorbers; extremely rapid dust formation
Tayyaba Zafar (1), Darach Watson (2) ((1) LAM, (2) DARK)

TL;DR
This study measures the metals-to-dust ratio across diverse galaxies and redshifts, revealing a consistent ratio close to local values and suggesting rapid dust formation closely linked to metal production, independent of galaxy properties.
Contribution
It provides the first direct, assumption-free measurements of the metals-to-dust ratio over a wide range of galaxy types and epochs, showing minimal variation and rapid dust formation.
Findings
Metals-to-dust ratio is consistent across galaxy types and redshifts.
No significant dependence on metallicity, column density, or galaxy age.
Rapid dust formation occurs in tandem with metal production, ruling out delayed formation models.
Abstract
Among the key parameters defining the ISM of galaxies is the fraction of the metals that are locked up in dust: the metals-to-dust ratio. This ratio bears not only on the ISM and its evolution, but particularly on the origin of cosmic dust. We combine extinction and abundance data from GRB afterglows, from QSO absorbers, as well as from galaxy-lensed QSOs, to determine the metals-to-dust ratios for lines-of-sight through a wide diversity of galaxies from blue, dwarf starbursts to massive ellipticals, across a vast range in redshift z=0.1-6.3, and nearly three orders of magnitude in column density and metal abundance. We thus determine the metals-to-dust ratio in a unique way, providing direct determinations of in situ gas and dust columns without recourse to assumptions with large uncertainties. We find that the metals-to-dust ratios in these systems are surprisingly close to the value…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
