GBM Volumetry using the 3D Slicer Medical Image Computing Platform
Jan Egger, Tina Kapur, Andriy Fedorov, Steve Pieper, James V. Miller,, Harini Veeraraghavan, Bernd Freisleben, Alexandra Golby, Christopher Nimsky,, Ron Kikinis

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that using 3D Slicer with GrowCut segmentation significantly reduces time and maintains high accuracy in measuring GBM tumor volumes compared to manual slice-by-slice segmentation.
Contribution
The paper introduces a semi-automated segmentation method in 3D Slicer that improves efficiency while preserving accuracy in GBM volumetry.
Findings
GrowCut segmentation reduces segmentation time by 61%.
Segmentation accuracy with GrowCut achieves an average Dice score of 88.43%.
Variability analysis shows consistent results among physicians.
Abstract
Volumetric change in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) over time is a critical factor in treatment decisions. Typically, the tumor volume is computed on a slice-by-slice basis using MRI scans obtained at regular intervals. (3D)Slicer - a free platform for biomedical research - provides an alternative to this manual slice-by-slice segmentation process, which is significantly faster and requires less user interaction. In this study, 4 physicians segmented GBMs in 10 patients, once using the competitive region-growing based GrowCut segmentation module of Slicer, and once purely by drawing boundaries completely manually on a slice-by-slice basis. Furthermore, we provide a variability analysis for three physicians for 12 GBMs. The time required for GrowCut segmentation was on an average 61% of the time required for a pure manual segmentation. A comparison of Slicer-based segmentation with manual…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
