A measure for the impact of research
Alejandro M. Arag\'on

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new research impact measure that shifts focus from quantity to quality, aiming for a fairer evaluation of scientific contributions at individual and institutional levels.
Contribution
It proposes a novel impact measure that de-emphasizes productivity and emphasizes scientific impact, extending from manuscripts to researchers and institutions.
Findings
The measure reduces emphasis on publication count.
It provides a more impact-focused evaluation framework.
Applicable to manuscripts, researchers, and institutions.
Abstract
The last few years have seen the proliferation of measures that quantify the scientific output of researches. Yet, these measures focus on productivity, thus fostering the "publish or perish" paradigm. This article proposes a measure that aims at quantifying the impact of research de-emphasizing productivity, thus providing scientists an alternative, conceivably fairer, evaluation of their work. Emphasis is placed on the scientist rather than on quantities that can grow unbounded. The measure, defined initially for manuscripts, is then extended to researchers and institutions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
Topicsscientometrics and bibliometrics research · Academic Publishing and Open Access · Research, Science, and Academia
