Are Planetary Systems Filled to Capacity? A Study Based on Kepler Results
Julia Fang, Jean-Luc Margot

TL;DR
This study analyzes Kepler data to determine the typical spacing of neighboring planets, finding many systems are filled to capacity, which constrains planetary formation and evolution models.
Contribution
It provides the first empirical estimate of planetary system packing and demonstrates that a significant fraction of systems are dynamically filled to capacity.
Findings
Average mutual Hill radii spacing is 21.7 with a standard deviation of 9.5.
The dynamical spacing distribution matches that of the Solar System.
Over 31% of 2-planet systems are dynamically packed.
Abstract
We used a sample of Kepler candidate planets with orbital periods less than 200 days and radii between 1.5 and 30 Earth radii to determine the typical dynamical spacing of neighboring planets. To derive the intrinsic (i.e., free of observational bias) dynamical spacing of neighboring planets, we generated populations of planetary systems following various dynamical spacing distributions, subjected them to synthetic observations by the Kepler spacecraft, and compared the properties of observed planets in our simulations with actual Kepler detections. We found that, on average, neighboring planets are spaced 21.7 mutual Hill radii apart with a standard deviation of 9.5. This dynamical spacing distribution is consistent with that of adjacent planets in the Solar System. To test the packed planetary systems hypothesis, the idea that all planetary systems are dynamically packed or filled to…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
