Proper motions of young stars in Chamaeleon. I. A Virtual Observatory study of spectroscopically confirmed members

TL;DR

This study uses Virtual Observatory tools to analyze proper motions of confirmed young stars in Chamaeleon, distinguishing members from interlopers and exploring their dynamical properties and potential associations.

Contribution

It provides a detailed proper motion analysis of young stars in Chamaeleon using Virtual Observatory data, clarifying membership and dynamical differences among related stellar groups.

Findings

Members of dark clouds have distinct proper motions from foreground and background stars.

Chamaeleon II may have different dynamical properties from Chamaeleon I.

Foreground clusters  and ta Cha have similar spatial motions, different from Chamaeleon I.

Abstract

(abridged) We want to provide further evidence of the origin of the proposed stellar members of Chamaeleon and to identify interlopers from the foreground \epsilon Cha and \eta Cha associations. To this aim, we compile lists of spectroscopically confirmed members of Chamaeleon I and II, \epsilon Cha and \eta Cha, and of background objects in the same line of sight. Using Virtual Observatory tools, we cross-match these lists with the UCAC3 catalogue to get the proper motions of the objects. In the vector point diagram, we identify the different moving groups, and use this information to study the membership of proposed candidate members of the associations from the literature. For those objects with available radial velocities, we compute their Galactic space velocities. We look for correlations between the known properties of the objects and their proper motions. The members of the dark clouds exhibit clearly different proper motions from those of the foreground associations and of the background stars. The data suggest that Chamaeleon II could have different dynamical properties from Chamaeleon I. Although the two foreground clusters \epsilon and \eta Chamaeleontis constitute two different proper motion groups, they have similar spatial motions, which are different from the spatial motion of Chamaeleon I. On the other hand, the space motions of the Chamaeleon II stars look more similar to those of the foreground clusters than to the Chamaeleon I stars, but the numbers are low. Hence, with the available data it is unclear to what extent the stellar populations in both clouds are physically connected to each other. We find no correlations between the proper motions and the properties of the objects in either of the clouds.