A Late-Time View of the Progenitors of Five Type IIP Supernovae
J. Maund (1,2), E. Reilly (1), S. Mattila (3) ((1) Astrophysics, Research Centre, Queen's University Belfast, (2) Dark Cosmology Centre, Niels, Bohr Institute, (3) Finnish Centre for Astronomy with ESO, University of, Turku)

TL;DR
This study uses late-time HST observations to confirm progenitors of five Type IIP supernovae, refine their properties, and assess dust effects, providing improved constraints on their initial masses and progenitor identifications.
Contribution
It presents new late-time imaging data and analysis techniques that confirm progenitors and refine their properties, improving understanding of Type IIP supernova origins.
Findings
Confirmed progenitor disappearances for SNe 2003gd, 2004A, 2005cs
Doubted progenitor identification for SN 1999ev
Estimated initial masses of progenitors between 8.4 and 12 solar masses
Abstract
The acquisition of late-time imaging is an important step in the analysis of pre-explosion observations of the progenitors of supernovae. We present late-time HST ACS WFC observations of the sites of five Type IIP SNe: 1999ev, 2003gd, 2004A, 2005cs and 2006my. Observations were conducted using the F435W, F555W and F814W filters. We confirm the progenitor identifications for SNe 2003gd, 2004A and 2005cs, through their disappearance. We find that a source previously excluded as being the progenitor of SN 2006my has now disappeared. The late-time observations of the site of SN 1999ev cast significant doubt over the nature of the source previously identified as the progenitor in pre-explosion WFPC2 images. The use of image subtraction techniques yields improved precision over photometry conducted on just the pre-explosion images alone. In particular, we note the increased depth of detection…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
