The evolution of HI and CIV quasar absorption line systems at 1.9 < z < 3.2
Tae-Sun Kim (1, 2), Adrian M. Partl (1), Robert F. Carswell (3) and, Volker M\"uller (1) ((1) Leibniz-Institut f\"ur Astrophysik Potsdam, Germany,, (2) Department of Astronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI (3), Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge, UK)

TL;DR
This study analyzes the distribution and evolution of approximately 3100 intergalactic HI absorbers at redshifts 1.9 to 3.2, revealing complex evolution patterns and the significant role of CIV-enriched systems in the intergalactic medium.
Contribution
It provides a detailed characterization of HI absorber populations, their evolution, and the impact of CIV enrichment, using high-resolution quasar spectra and combining multiple analysis methods.
Findings
The mean number density evolution slows down at z < 1.5.
The HI column density distribution is a combination of unenriched and CIV-enriched populations.
CIV-enriched absorbers account for about 40% of the total HI mass density.
Abstract
We have investigated the distribution and evolution of ~3100 intergalactic HI absorbers with HI column densities log N(HI) = [12.75, 17.0] at 1.9 < z < 3.2, using 18 high resolution, high S/N quasar spectra obtained from the ESO VLT/UVES archive. We used two sets of Voigt profile fitting analysis, one including all the available high-order Lyman lines to obtain reliable HI column densities of saturated lines, and another using only the Ly-alpha lines. There is no significant difference between the results from the two fits. Combining our results with literature data, the mean number density at 0 < z < 4 is not well described by a single power law and strongly suggests that its evolution slows down at z < 1.5 at the high and low column density ranges. We also divided our entire HI absorbers at 1.9 < z < 3.2 into two samples, the unenriched forest and the CIV-enriched forest, depending on…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
