Systematic Effects in Interferometric Observations of the CMB Polarization

TL;DR

This paper presents a comprehensive simulation pipeline for interferometric CMB polarization observations, analyzing systematic errors and their impact on detecting primordial B-modes, with methods to recover the tensor-to-scalar ratio within 10% accuracy.

Contribution

It introduces a complete simulation framework including systematic errors and compares two power spectrum estimation methods, providing guidelines for controlling systematics in CMB polarization experiments.

Findings

Both methods yield consistent power spectrum results.

Systematic errors must be controlled within specified precisions.

The experiment can detect B-modes at r=0.01 if systematics are managed properly.

Abstract

The detection of the primordial $B$-mode spectrum of the polarized cosmic microwave background (CMB) signal may provide a probe of inflation. However, observation of such a faint signal requires excellent control of systematic errors. Interferometry proves to be a promising approach for overcoming such a challenge. In this paper we present a complete simulation pipeline of interferometric observations of CMB polarization, including systematic errors. We employ two different methods for obtaining the power spectra from mock data produced by simulated observations: the maximum likelihood method and the method of Gibbs sampling. We show that the results from both methods are consistent with each other, as well as, within a factor of 6, with analytical estimates. Several categories of systematic errors are considered: instrumental errors, consisting of antenna gain and antenna coupling errors, and beam errors, consisting of antenna pointing errors, beam cross-polarization and beam shape (and size) errors. In order to recover the tensor-to-scalar ratio, $r$, within a 10% tolerance level, which ensures the experiment is sensitive enough to detect the $B$-signal at $r=0.01$ in the multipole range $28 < \ell < 384$, we find that, for a QUBIC-like experiment, Gaussian-distributed systematic errors must be controlled with precisions of $|g_{rms}| = 0.1$ for antenna gain, $|\epsilon_{rms}| = 5 \times 10^{-4}$ for antenna coupling, $\delta_{rms} \approx 0.7^\circ$ for pointing, $\zeta_{rms} \approx 0.7^\circ$ for beam shape, and $\mu_{rms} = 5 \times 10^{-4}$ for beam cross-polarization.