Is a rational explanation of wave-particle duality possible?
S.A. Rashkovskiy

TL;DR
This paper proposes a new interpretation of wave-particle duality, introducing a rule linking corpuscular and wave properties, and offers a physical explanation for quantum phenomena that challenges traditional probabilistic views.
Contribution
It introduces a novel interpretation of quantum particles as transient objects born in wave fields, replacing Born's rule and providing a physical basis for quantum indiscernibility and uncertainty.
Findings
Proposes a new rule relating wave and particle properties.
Explains quantum indistinguishability and the concept of trajectories.
Provides a classical physics explanation for the uncertainty principle.
Abstract
Wave-particle duality is one of the fundamental properties of matter and at the same time, one of the mysteries of modern physics. In this paper, we propose and analyze a new interpretation of the wave-particle duality, and propose a new rule that relates the corpuscular and wave properties of quantum particles, and replaces the Born's rule. We introduce a new representation about quantum particles as temporary objects that are born permanently in a wave field and spontaneously decayed due to their "instability". Thus, we fill with the physical meaning the standard notions of "creation" and "annihilation" of the particles, used in the second quantization formalism. We show that the traditional probabilistic interpretation of quantum mechanics in the form of the Born's rule is an approximate consequence of the proposed theory. The proposed theory allows explaining the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
