A graphical analysis of the systematic error of classical binned methods in constructing luminosity functions
Zunli Yuan, Jiancheng Wang

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the systematic errors of classical binned methods for constructing luminosity functions, revealing their limitations and proposing a new binning approach to improve estimates, especially for evolving LFs.
Contribution
The paper introduces a new binning method that reduces systematic errors in classical LF estimation methods, improving their accuracy for evolving luminosity functions.
Findings
Classical 1/Va and PC methods differ near flux limits.
Both methods underestimate low luminosity bins.
New binning method improves estimates for both methods.
Abstract
The classical 1/Va and PC methods of constructing binned luminosity functions (LFs) are revisited and compared by graphical analysis. Using both theoretical analysis and illustration with an example, we show why the two methods give different results for the bins which are crossed by the flux limit curves . Based on a combined sample simulated by a Monte Carlo method, the estimate of two methods are compared with the input model LFs. The two methods give identical and ideal estimate for the high luminosity points of each redshift interval. However, for the low luminosity bins of all the redshift intervals both methods give smaller estimate than the input model. We conclude that once the LF is evolving with redshift, the classical binned methods will unlikely give an ideal estimate over the total luminosity range. Page & Carrera (2000) noticed that for objects close…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
