Odd-even staggerings on nuclear binding energy described by the covariant density functional theory
Long Jun Wang, Bao Yuan Sun, Jian Min Dong, Wen Hui Long

TL;DR
This study systematically analyzes odd-even staggering in nuclear binding energies using covariant density functional theories, highlighting discrepancies and improvements with modified pairing interactions, and emphasizing the need for a unified relativistic mechanism.
Contribution
It demonstrates the application of covariant density functional theories to describe OES in various isotopes and proposes modifications to pairing interactions for better accuracy.
Findings
CDF models describe OES reasonably well for many isotopes.
Discrepancies in light and heavy isotopes are partially corrected by Z- or N-dependent factors.
Unified relativistic mechanisms are needed for improved quantitative accuracy.
Abstract
The odd-even staggerings (OES) on nuclear binding energies are studied systematically within the covariant density functional (CDF) theories, specifically the relativistic Hartree-Fock-Bogoliubov (RHFB) and the relativistic Hartree-Bogoliubov (RHB) theories. Taking the finite-range Gogny force D1S as an effective pairing interaction, both CDF models can provide appropriate descriptions on the OESs of nuclear binding energies for C, O, Ca, Ni, Zr, Sn, Ce, Gd and Pb isotopes as well as for N=50 and 82 isotones. However, due to the inconsistence between the non-relativistic pairing interaction and the relativistic effective Lagrangians, there exist some systematical discrepancies from the data, i.e., the underestimated OESs in light C and O isotopes and the overestimated ones in heavy region, respectively. Such discrepancies can be eliminated partially by introducing a - or…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
