Weighted Sets of Probabilities and Minimax Weighted Expected Regret: New Approaches for Representing Uncertainty and Making Decisions
Joseph Y. Halpern, Samantha Leung

TL;DR
This paper introduces weighted sets of probabilities to better represent uncertainty and proposes minimax weighted expected regret (MWER) as a decision-making method, addressing issues with traditional probability updating.
Contribution
It develops a novel weighted probability framework and a new decision rule, MWER, with axiomatic foundations for static and dynamic decision-making.
Findings
Weighted sets of probabilities improve uncertainty representation.
MWER effectively guides decisions under uncertainty.
Axiomatization characterizes preferences induced by MWER.
Abstract
We consider a setting where an agent's uncertainty is represented by a set of probability measures, rather than a single measure. Measure-by-measure updating of such a set of measures upon acquiring new information is well-known to suffer from problems; agents are not always able to learn appropriately. To deal with these problems, we propose using weighted sets of probabilities: a representation where each measure is associated with a weight, which denotes its significance. We describe a natural approach to updating in such a situation and a natural approach to determining the weights. We then show how this representation can be used in decision-making, by modifying a standard approach to decision making -- minimizing expected regret -- to obtain minimax weighted expected regret (MWER). We provide an axiomatization that characterizes preferences induced by MWER both in the static and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
