The orientations of the Giza pyramids and associated structures
Erin Nell, Clive Ruggles

TL;DR
This study provides a highly precise survey of the Giza pyramids' orientations, clarifying their alignment with cardinal directions and associated structures, using advanced measurement techniques to improve upon previous data.
Contribution
It introduces a new survey methodology focusing on structural segments with best-fit techniques, enhancing the accuracy of pyramid orientation data compared to earlier triangulation methods.
Findings
Pyramids' north-south axes differ by about 0.5 arc minutes.
Khafre's sides are more perpendicular than Khufu's.
East-west axes are closer to true cardinal directions.
Abstract
Ever since Flinders Petrie undertook a theodolite survey on the Giza plateau in 1881 and drew attention to the extraordinary degree of precision with which the three colossal pyramids are oriented upon the four cardinal directions, there have been a great many suggestions as to how this was achieved and why it was of importance. Surprisingly, given the many astronomical hypotheses and speculations that have been offered in the intervening 130 years, there have been remarkably few attempts to reaffirm or improve on the basic survey data concerning the primary orientations. This paper presents the results of a week-long Total Station survey undertaken by the authors during December 2006 whose principal aim was to clarify the basic data concerning the orientation of each side of the three large pyramids and to determine, as accurately as possible, the orientations of as many as possible…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
