On the non-uniqueness problem of the covariant Dirac theory and the spin-rotation coupling
Mayeul Arminjon

TL;DR
This paper investigates the non-uniqueness of the covariant Dirac theory's Hamiltonian formulations, demonstrating that different Hamiltonians can be physically non-equivalent, thus emphasizing the need for experimental verification of the spin-rotation coupling.
Contribution
It critically examines claims of uniqueness in the covariant Dirac theory and shows that the spin-rotation coupling term's physical reality remains unconfirmed.
Findings
Two Hamiltonians in the same frame are non-equivalent
The spin-rotation coupling term's reality is unverified
Claims of a unique prescription are challenged
Abstract
Gorbatenko & Neznamov [arXiv:1301.7599] recently claimed the absence of the title problem. In this paper, the reason for that problem is reexplained by using the notions of a unitary transformation and of the mean value of an operator, invoked by them. Their arguments actually aim at proving the uniqueness of a particular prescription for solving this problem. But that prescription is again shown non-unique. Two Hamiltonians in the same reference frame in a Minkowski spacetime, only one of them including the spin-rotation coupling term, are proved to be physically non-equivalent. This confirms that the reality of that coupling should be checked experimentally.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
