Nano-Optical Device Design with the Use of Open-Source Parallel Version FDTD and Commercial Finite Element Package
Y. Liu, K. Chang

TL;DR
This paper compares open-source FDTD and commercial finite element methods for nano-optical device design, focusing on implementation, performance, and computational architecture on different hardware platforms.
Contribution
It demonstrates the application and performance analysis of open-source and commercial tools in nano-optical device design on high-performance and standard computing hardware.
Findings
Open-source FDTD (MEEP) effectively runs on supercomputers for nano-optical design.
Commercial finite element package (COMSOL) performs well on standard workstations.
Performance differences highlight hardware and software considerations in nano-optical simulations.
Abstract
In this paper, the implementation of open-source parallel-version FDTD (Finite-Difference-Time-Domain) software, MEEP, on Texas A&M supercomputers and commercial finite element package, COMSOL, on a single workstation for the design design of nano-optical device is reported. The the computer architecture and performance of both numerical methods on the same design will be briefly described.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPhotonic and Optical Devices · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Semiconductor Lasers and Optical Devices
