The Importance of Physical Models for Deriving Dust Masses and Grain Size Distributions in Supernova Ejecta I: Radiatively Heated Dust in the Crab Nebula
Tea Temim, Eli Dwek

TL;DR
This study models the heating and radiation of dust in the Crab Nebula using a physical approach, revealing more accurate dust masses and grain size distributions than previous simplified models, with implications for understanding supernova contributions to cosmic dust.
Contribution
It introduces a physical model for dust heating and radiation in supernova remnants, providing more precise dust mass and grain size estimates than prior simplified methods.
Findings
Derived dust mass of 0.019-0.13 solar masses depending on composition
Found a power-law grain size distribution with index 3.5-4.0
Dust properties consistent with Type IIP supernovae formation scenarios
Abstract
Recent far-infrared (IR) observations of supernova remnants (SNRs) have revealed significantly large amounts of newly-condensed dust in their ejecta, comparable to the total mass of available refractory elements. The dust masses derived from these observations assume that all the grains of a given species radiate at the same temperature, regardless of the dust heating mechanism or grain radius. In this paper, we derive the dust mass in the ejecta of the Crab Nebula, using a physical model for the heating and radiation from the dust. We adopt a power-law distribution of grain sizes and two different dust compositions (silicates and amorphous carbon), and calculate the heating rate of each dust grain by the radiation from the pulsar wind nebula (PWN). We find that the grains attain a continuous range of temperatures, depending on their size and composition. The total mass derived from the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
