On Quantifying Dependence: A Framework for Developing Interpretable Measures
Matthew Reimherr, Dan L. Nicolae

TL;DR
This paper introduces a flexible framework for developing and selecting dependence measures focused on interpretability and tailored to specific needs, moving beyond mere detection to quantification of relationships.
Contribution
It proposes a general, adaptable framework for creating dependence measures emphasizing interpretability, integrating information-theoretic tools, and demonstrating applications with real data examples.
Findings
Many existing measures fit within the framework.
The methodology guides the development of tailored dependence measures.
Applications include income-education data and geomagnetic storm analysis.
Abstract
We present a framework for selecting and developing measures of dependence when the goal is the quantification of a relationship between two variables, not simply the establishment of its existence. Much of the literature on dependence measures is focused, at least implicitly, on detection or revolves around the inclusion/exclusion of particular axioms and discussing which measures satisfy said axioms. In contrast, we start with only a few nonrestrictive guidelines focused on existence, range and interpretability, which provide a very open and flexible framework. For quantification, the most crucial is the notion of interpretability, whose foundation can be found in the work of Goodman and Kruskal [Measures of Association for Cross Classifications (1979) Springer], and whose importance can be seen in the popularity of tools such as the in linear regression. While Goodman and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
