The Stellar Masses of ~40,000 UV Selected Galaxies from the WiggleZ Survey at 0.3<z<1.0: Analogues of Lyman Break Galaxies?
Manda Banerji (UCL/IoA Cambridge), Karl Glazebrook, Chris Blake, Sarah, Brough, Matthew Colless, Carlos Contreras, Warrick Couch, Darren J. Croton,, Scott Croom, Tamara M. Davis, Michael J. Drinkwater, Karl Forster, David, Gilbank, Mike Gladders, Ben Jelliffe, Russell J. Jurek

TL;DR
This study characterizes stellar masses and star formation rates of ~40,000 UV-selected galaxies at 0.3<z<1.0 from the WiggleZ survey, revealing their similarities to high-redshift Lyman break galaxies and emphasizing the importance of NIR data for accurate mass estimates.
Contribution
It provides the first large-scale analysis of UV luminous galaxies at intermediate redshifts, highlighting the impact of NIR photometry and stellar population assumptions on mass estimates.
Findings
Median stellar masses range from 10^9.6 to 10^10.4 M_sun depending on detection.
Including NIR data improves the precision of stellar mass estimates.
Star formation rates are 3-10 M_sun/yr, comparable to high-redshift Lyman break galaxies.
Abstract
We characterise the stellar masses and star formation rates in a sample of almost 40000 spectroscopically confirmed UV luminous galaxies at 0.3<z<1.0 selected from within the WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey. In particular, we match this UV bright population to wide-field infrared surveys such as the near infrared UKIDSS LAS and the mid infrared WISE All-Sky Survey. We find that ~30% of the UV luminous WiggleZ galaxies are detected at >5sigma in the UKIDSS-LAS at all redshifts. An even more luminous subset of 15% are also detected in the WISE 3.4 and 4.6um bands. We compute stellar masses for this very large sample of extremely blue galaxies and quantify the sensitivity of the stellar mass estimates to various assumptions made during the SED fitting. The median stellar masses are log10(M*/M0)=9.6\pm0.7, 10.2\pm0.5 and 10.4\pm0.4 for the IR-undetected, UKIDSS detected and UKIDSS+WISE detected…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
