Elicitation of Probabilities for Belief Networks: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Information
Marek J. Druzdzel, Linda C. van der Gaag

TL;DR
This paper presents a method for eliciting probabilities for belief networks by combining qualitative and quantitative information, using constraints to derive probability distributions without requiring extensive statistical data.
Contribution
It introduces a non-invasive elicitation technique that encodes expert knowledge as constraints and derives probability distributions, addressing challenges in probability estimation.
Findings
Effective integration of qualitative and quantitative info
Can work with limited or non-numeric expert input
Produces probability distributions consistent with expert constraints
Abstract
Although the usefulness of belief networks for reasoning under uncertainty is widely accepted, obtaining numerical probabilities that they require is still perceived a major obstacle. Often not enough statistical data is available to allow for reliable probability estimation. Available information may not be directly amenable for encoding in the network. Finally, domain experts may be reluctant to provide numerical probabilities. In this paper, we propose a method for elicitation of probabilities from a domain expert that is non-invasive and accommodates whatever probabilistic information the expert is willing to state. We express all available information, whether qualitative or quantitative in nature, in a canonical form consisting of (in) equalities expressing constraints on the hyperspace of possible joint probability distributions. We then use this canonical form to derive…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · AI-based Problem Solving and Planning · Cognitive Science and Mapping
