Counterfactuals and Policy Analysis in Structural Models
Alexander Balke, Judea Pearl

TL;DR
This paper introduces a method for evaluating counterfactuals within structural causal models, enabling more accurate policy analysis and fault diagnosis in complex systems.
Contribution
It presents a novel approach to revalue counterfactuals in nonlinear structural models, extending traditional econometric methods for better policy evaluation.
Findings
Provides a coherent framework for policy control analysis
Enables counterfactual evaluation in nonlinear models
Improves fault diagnosis and liability determination
Abstract
Evaluation of counterfactual queries (e.g., "If A were true, would C have been true?") is important to fault diagnosis, planning, determination of liability, and policy analysis. We present a method of revaluating counterfactuals when the underlying causal model is represented by structural models - a nonlinear generalization of the simultaneous equations models commonly used in econometrics and social sciences. This new method provides a coherent means for evaluating policies involving the control of variables which, prior to enacting the policy were influenced by other variables in the system.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
