Testing Implication of Probabilistic Dependencies
Michael S. K. M. Wong

TL;DR
This paper introduces a non-axiomatic chase method for testing probabilistic dependencies, offering a powerful tool for theoretical analysis and revealing connections between databases and probabilistic reasoning.
Contribution
It proposes a chase-based approach for probabilistic dependency implication testing, expanding beyond traditional axiomatic methods.
Findings
Chase method can determine if a dependency follows from others.
The approach offers new insights into database and probabilistic reasoning connections.
The computation may be exponential in some cases.
Abstract
Axiomatization has been widely used for testing logical implications. This paper suggests a non-axiomatic method, the chase, to test if a new dependency follows from a given set of probabilistic dependencies. Although the chase computation may require exponential time in some cases, this technique is a powerful tool for establishing nontrivial theoretical results. More importantly, this approach provides valuable insight into the intriguing connection between relational databases and probabilistic reasoning systems.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Data Quality and Management · Data Management and Algorithms
