Geometric Implications of the Naive Bayes Assumption
Mark Alan Peot

TL;DR
This paper explores the geometric implications of the Naive Bayes assumption, extending known results about decision surfaces to m-ary observations and examining how dependencies affect these surfaces.
Contribution
It generalizes the hyperplane separability result to m-ary observations and discusses the impact of observation dependencies on decision boundaries.
Findings
Decision surfaces are hyperplanes for binary observations.
Extension of hyperplane separability to m-ary observations.
Observation dependencies influence decision surface geometry.
Abstract
A naive (or Idiot) Bayes network is a network with a single hypothesis node and several observations that are conditionally independent given the hypothesis. We recently surveyed a number of members of the UAI community and discovered a general lack of understanding of the implications of the Naive Bayes assumption on the kinds of problems that can be solved by these networks. It has long been recognized [Minsky 61] that if observations are binary, the decision surfaces in these networks are hyperplanes. We extend this result (hyperplane separability) to Naive Bayes networks with m-ary observations. In addition, we illustrate the effect of observation-observation dependencies on decision surfaces. Finally, we discuss the implications of these results on knowledge acquisition and research in learning.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · AI-based Problem Solving and Planning · Logic, programming, and type systems
