Estimators of Binary Spatial Autoregressive Models: A Monte Carlo Study
Raffaella Calabrese, Johan A. Elkink

TL;DR
This paper critically compares various estimators for binary spatial autoregressive models through a comprehensive Monte Carlo simulation, highlighting their performance across different levels of spatial autocorrelation and sample sizes.
Contribution
First to provide an extensive Monte Carlo study evaluating the properties of estimators for spatial binary choice models.
Findings
Gibbs estimator performs best at low spatial autocorrelation
Recursive Importance Sampler excels at high spatial autocorrelation
Linearized GMM estimator is fastest and accurate for large samples and low autocorrelation
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to provide a cohesive description and a critical comparison of the main estimators proposed in the literature for spatial binary choice models. The properties of such estimators are investigated using a theoretical and simulation study. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first paper that provides a comprehensive Monte Carlo study of the estimators' properties. This simulation study shows that the Gibbs estimator Le Sage (2000) performs best for low spatial autocorrelation, while the Recursive Importance Sampler Beron & Vijverberg (2004) performs best for high spatial autocorrelation. The same results are obtained by increasing the sample size. Finally, the linearized General Method of Moments estimator Klier & McMillen (2008) is the fastest algorithm that provides accurate estimates for low spatial autocorrelation and large sample size.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSpatial and Panel Data Analysis · Regional Economics and Spatial Analysis · Economic and Environmental Valuation
