Low mass planets in protoplanetary disks with net vertical magnetic fields: the Planetary Wake and Gap Opening
Zhaohuan Zhu, James M. Stone, and Roman R. Rafikov

TL;DR
This study uses 3D MHD simulations to show that low mass planets can open gaps in protoplanetary disks with net vertical magnetic fields, challenging traditional viscous criteria and highlighting the role of magnetic fields in planet-disk interactions.
Contribution
It demonstrates that magnetic field transport enhances gap opening by low mass planets in MRI-turbulent disks, contrasting with viscous hydrodynamic models and emphasizing the importance of magnetic geometry.
Findings
Magnetic fields enable gap opening by low mass planets even without viscosity.
MRI turbulence leads to deeper, wider gaps compared to viscous HD disks with same stress.
Magnetic field geometry significantly influences gap formation and planet migration.
Abstract
We study wakes and gap opening by low mass planets in gaseous protoplanetary disks threaded by net vertical magnetic fields which drive magnetohydrodynamical (MHD) turbulence through the magnetorotational instabilty (MRI), using three dimensional simulations in the unstratified local shearing box approximation. The wakes, which are excited by the planets, are damped by shocks similar to the wake damping in inviscid hydrodynamic (HD) disks. Angular momentum deposition by shock damping opens gaps in both MHD turbulent disks and inviscid HD disks even for low mass planets, in contradiction to the "thermal criterion" for gap opening. To test the "viscous criterion", we compared gap properties in MRI-turbulent disks to those in viscous HD disks having the same stress, and found that the same mass planet opens a significantly deeper and wider gap in net vertical flux MHD disks than in viscous…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
