The Biological Origin of Linguistic Diversity
Andrea Baronchelli, Nick Chater, Romualdo Pastor-Satorras, Morten H., Christiansen

TL;DR
This paper proposes that biological flexibility in learning, driven by cultural evolution, underpins the vast diversity of human languages, rather than specific genetic adaptations for language features.
Contribution
It models language change and dispersion to show that flexible learning is a key biological pressure enabling linguistic diversity across cultures.
Findings
Flexible learning is driven by cultural evolution and migration.
Genetic adaptations for language are less significant than learning flexibility.
Linguistic diversity results from coevolution of genes and cultural change.
Abstract
In contrast with animal communication systems, diversity is characteristic of almost every aspect of human language. Languages variously employ tones, clicks, or manual signs to signal differences in meaning; some languages lack the noun-verb distinction (e.g., Straits Salish), whereas others have a proliferation of fine-grained syntactic categories (e.g., Tzeltal); and some languages do without morphology (e.g., Mandarin), while others pack a whole sentence into a single word (e.g., Cayuga). A challenge for evolutionary biology is to reconcile the diversity of languages with the high degree of biological uniformity of their speakers. Here, we model processes of language change and geographical dispersion and find a consistent pressure for flexible learning, irrespective of the language being spoken. This pressure arises because flexible learners can best cope with the observed high…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
