A Scaler-Based Data Acquisition System for Measuring Parity-Violating Asymmetry in Deep Inelastic Scattering
Ramesh Subedi, Diancheng Wang, Kai Pan, Xiaoyan Deng, Robert Michaels,, Paul E. Reimer, Albert Shahinyan, Bogdan Wojtsekhowski, Xiaochao Zheng

TL;DR
This paper presents a specialized scaler-based data acquisition system developed for precise measurement of parity-violating asymmetries in deep inelastic scattering, achieving high efficiency, low background contamination, and improved accuracy over previous data.
Contribution
The paper introduces a novel DAQ system with intrinsic particle identification that effectively measures tiny asymmetries and controls background contamination in deep inelastic scattering experiments.
Findings
Achieved electron efficiency above 91% during most of the experiment
Controlled pion contamination to below 2×10^{-4}
Systematic uncertainty due to deadtime was under 0.5%
Abstract
An experiment that measured the parity-violating asymmetries in deep inelastic scattering was completed at the Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility in experimental Hall A. From these asymmetries, a combination of the quark weak axial charge could be extracted with a factor of five improvement in precision over world data. To achieve this, asymmetries at the level needed to be measured at event rates up to 600 kHz and the high pion background typical to deep inelastic scattering experiments needed to be rejected efficiently. A specialized data acquisition (DAQ) system with intrinsic particle identification (PID) was successfully developed and used: The pion contamination in the electron samples was controlled at the order of or below with an electron efficiency of higher than 91 % during most of the production period of the experiment, the systematic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
