$(3,1)^*$-choosability of planar graphs without adjacent short cycles
Min Chen, Andre Raspaud

TL;DR
This paper proves that planar graphs without 4-cycles adjacent to short cycles are $(3,1)^*$-choosable, extending previous results by allowing certain 4-cycles, and partially answering an open question about all planar graphs without 4-cycles.
Contribution
It introduces a new class of planar graphs with nonadjacent 4-cycles and proves their $(3,1)^*$-choosability, broadening the scope of known results.
Findings
Planar graphs without 4-cycles adjacent to 3- and 4-cycles are $(3,1)^*$-choosable.
All planar graphs without 4-cycles are $(3,1)^*$-choosable.
Extends previous results by relaxing the adjacency restrictions on 4-cycles.
Abstract
A list assignment of a graph is a function that assigns a list of colors to each vertex . An -coloring is a mapping that assigns a color to each vertex so that at most neighbors of receive color . A graph is said to be -choosable if it admits an -coloring for every list assignment with for all . In 2001, Lih et al. \cite{LSWZ-01} proved that planar graphs without 4- and -cycles are -choosable, where . Later, Dong and Xu \cite{DX-09} proved that planar graphs without 4- and l-cycles are -choosable, where . There exist planar graphs containing 4-cycles that are not -choosable (Crown, Crown and Woodall, 1986 \cite{CCW-86}). This partly explains the fact that in all above known sufficient…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Graph Theory Research
