Efficient satellite quenching at z~1 from the GEEC2 spectroscopic survey of galaxy groups
Angus Mok, Michael L. Balogh, Sean L. McGee, David J. Wilman, Alexis, Finoguenov, Masayuki Tanaka, Stefania Giodini, Richard G. Bower, Jennifer L., Connelly, Annie Hou, John S. Mulchaey, Laura C. Parker

TL;DR
This study investigates galaxy quenching at z~1 in galaxy groups, revealing rapid environmental effects on star formation and a high fraction of passive galaxies, with quenching timescales shorter than 1 Gyr.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the efficiency and timescales of satellite galaxy quenching in groups at z~1, using deep spectroscopic data and a dust-insensitive classification method.
Findings
Passive galaxy fraction is higher in groups than in the field.
Environmental quenching efficiency is approximately 0.4.
Quenching occurs rapidly, within less than 1 Gyr.
Abstract
We present deep GMOS-S spectroscopy for 11 galaxy groups at 0.8<z<1.0, for galaxies with r_{AB}<24.75. Our sample is highly complete (>66%) for eight of the eleven groups. Using an optical-NIR colour-colour diagram, the galaxies in the sample were separated with a dust insensitive method into three categories: passive (red), star-forming (blue), and intermediate (green). The strongest environmental dependence is observed in the fraction of passive galaxies, which make up only ~20 per cent of the field in the mass range 10^{10.3}<M_{star}/M_\odot<10^{11.0} but are the dominant component of groups. If we assume that the properties of the field are similar to those of the `pre-accreted' population, the environment quenching efficiency (\epsilon_\rho) is defined as the fraction of field galaxies required to be quenched in order to match the observed red fraction inside groups. The…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
