The missing link between ultraluminous X-ray sources and metallicity
M. Mapelli (INAF-OAPd)

TL;DR
This paper investigates how low metallicity environments contribute to the formation of massive stellar black holes, which can explain the nature of ultraluminous X-ray sources without exceeding the Eddington limit.
Contribution
It introduces N-body simulations with metallicity-dependent stellar evolution to explore pathways for forming X-ray binaries with massive stellar black holes.
Findings
Anti-correlation between metallicity and ULX numbers
MSBHs can account for ULXs without super-Eddington accretion
Simulations identify key formation pathways for MSBH-powered X-ray binaries
Abstract
The nature of ultraluminous X-ray sources (ULXs) is still debated. Recent studies show that metal-poor massive stars can collapse into massive stellar black holes (MSBHs), that is black holes with mass > 25 Msun. Such MSBHs are sufficiently massive to explain most ULXs without requiring substantial violations of the Eddington limit. The recent finding of an anti-correlation between metallicity of the environment and number of ULXs per galaxy supports this hypothesis. We present the results of recent N-body simulations, including metallicity dependent stellar evolution, and we discuss the main pathways to produce X-ray binaries powered by MSBHs.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAstrophysical Phenomena and Observations · Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae · Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
