On the Tradeoff between Stability and Fit
Edith Cohen, Graham Cormode, Nick Duffield, Carsten Lund

TL;DR
This paper explores the balance between stability and adaptability in optimization problems, introducing a formal framework and algorithms for stable solutions that minimize change costs while maintaining system efficiency.
Contribution
It provides a formal formulation of the stability-fit tradeoff, extends PPS sampling to stable settings, and offers efficient algorithms for dynamic problem adjustments.
Findings
Exact solutions for stable extensions of key problems
Efficient incremental algorithms for dynamic updates
Application to monitoring and anomaly detection
Abstract
In computing, as in many aspects of life, changes incur cost. Many optimization problems are formulated as a one-time instance starting from scratch. However, a common case that arises is when we already have a set of prior assignments, and must decide how to respond to a new set of constraints, given that each change from the current assignment comes at a price. That is, we would like to maximize the fitness or efficiency of our system, but we need to balance it with the changeout cost from the previous state. We provide a precise formulation for this tradeoff and analyze the resulting {\em stable extensions} of some fundamental problems in measurement and analytics. Our main technical contribution is a stable extension of PPS (probability proportional to size) weighted random sampling, with applications to monitoring and anomaly detection problems. We also provide a general…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMachine Learning and Algorithms · Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference · Data Management and Algorithms
