
TL;DR
This paper investigates the stability of Earth's ice age cycles under astronomical forcing, revealing that small fluctuations could cause unpredictable shifts, depending on the model's parameters and the strength of forcing effects.
Contribution
It applies the concept of generalized synchronization to analyze seven conceptual ice age models, highlighting their varying stability and the potential for unpredictability in glacial cycles.
Findings
Astronomical forcing can synchronize ice age models over a wide parameter range.
Models show weak structural stability, making them sensitive to fluctuations.
High eccentricity Rayleigh numbers do not guarantee reliable synchronization.
Abstract
It is commonly accepted that the variations of Earth's orbit and obliquity control the timing of Pleistocene glacial-interglacial cycles. Evidence comes from power spectrum analysis of palaeoclimate records and from inspection of the timing of glacial and deglacial transitions. However, we do not know how tight this control is. Is it, for example, conceivable that random climatic fluctuations could cause a delay in deglaciation, bad enough to skip a full precession or obliquity cycle and subsequently modify the sequence of ice ages? To address this question, seven previously published conceptual models of ice ages are analysed by reference to the notion of generalised synchronisation. Insight is being gained by comparing the effects of the astronomical forcing with idealised forcings composed of only one or two periodic components. In general, the richness of the astronomical forcing…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
