Unified model for conductance through DNA with the Landauer-Buttiker formalism

TL;DR

This paper presents a comprehensive model combining ab initio calculations, Green's function transport theory, and decoherence parameters to accurately predict DNA conductance, aligning well with experimental data.

Contribution

It introduces a unified approach that incorporates decoherence effects on both G:C and A:T base pairs to match experimental DNA conductance measurements.

Findings

Decoherence rates are 6 meV for G:C and 1.5 meV for A:T base pairs.

Backbone interactions can significantly influence coherent transmission.

Including decoherence explains the discrepancy between theoretical and experimental conductance.

Abstract

In this work, we model the zero-bias conductance for the four different DNA strands that were used in conductance measurement experiment [A. K. Mahapatro, K. J. Jeong, G. U. Lee, and D. B. Janes, Nanotechnology 18, 195202 (2007)]. Our approach consists of three elements: (i) ab initio calculations of DNA, (ii) Green's function approach for transport calculations, and (iii) the use of two parameters to determine the decoherence rates. We first study the role of the backbone. We find that the backbone can alter the coherent transmission significantly at some energy points by interacting with the bases, though the overall shape of the transmission stays similar for the two cases. More importantly, we find that the coherent electrical conductance is tremendously smaller than what the experiments measure. We consider DNA strands under a variety of different experimental conditions and show that even in the most ideal cases, the calculated coherent conductance is much smaller than the experimental conductance. To understand the reasons for this, we carefully look at the effect of decoherence. By including decoherence, we show that our model can rationalize the measured conductance of the four strands, both qualitatively and quantitatively. We find that the effect of decoherence on G:C base pairs is crucial in getting agreement with the experiments. However, the decoherence on G:C base pairs alone does not explain the experimental conductance in strands containing a number of A:T base pairs. Including decoherence on A:T base pairs is also essential. By fitting the experimental trends and magnitudes in the conductance of the four different DNA molecules, we estimate for the first time that the deocherence rate is 6 meV for G:C and 1.5 meV for A:T base pairs.