The Chandra-COSMOS survey IV: X-ray spectra of the bright sample

TL;DR

This study analyzes the X-ray spectra of the brightest extragalactic sources in the Chandra-COSMOS survey, providing detailed insights into their absorption, spectral shape, and luminosity distributions, with implications for understanding AGN properties.

Contribution

First comprehensive spectral analysis of a large, optically-identified X-ray source sample in COSMOS, revealing differences between AGN types and obscuration characteristics.

Findings

Type-1 and type-2 AGN show distinct spectral index distributions.

Identified a significant population of high-luminosity, highly obscured AGN.

X-ray/optical flux ratio correlates with obscuration levels.

Abstract

We present the X-ray spectral analysis of the 390 brightest extragalactic sources in the Chandra-COSMOS catalog, showing at least 70 net counts in the 0.5-7 keV band. This sample has a 100% completeness in optical-IR identification, with 75% of the sample having a spectroscopic redshift and 25% a photometric redshift. Our analysis allows us to accurately determine the intrinsic absorption, the broad band continuum shape ({\Gamma}) and intrinsic L(2-10) distributions, with an accuracy better than 30% on the spectral parameters for 95% of the sample. The sample is equally divided in type-1 (49.7%) and type-2 AGN (48.7%) plus few passive galaxies at low z. We found a significant difference in the distribution of {\Gamma} of type-1 and type-2, with small intrinsic dispersion, a weak correlation of {\Gamma} with L(2-10) and a large population (15% of the sample) of high luminosity, highly obscured (QSO2) sources. The distribution of the X ray/Optical flux ratio (Log(FX /Fi)) for type-1 is narrow (0 < X/O < 1), while type-2 are spread up to X/O = 2. The X/O correlates well with the amount of X-ray obscuration. Finally, a small sample of Compton thick candidates and peculiar sources is presented. In the appendix we discuss the comparison between Chandra and XMM-Newton spectra for 280 sources in common. We found a small systematic difference, with XMM-Newton spectra that tend to have softer power-laws and lower obscuration.