Time--distance inversions for horizontal and vertical flows on supergranular scales applied to MDI and HMI data
Michal Svanda (1, 2), Hannah Schunker (3), Raymond Burston (3) ((1), Astronomical Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (2), Astronomical Institute, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic (3), Max-Planck-Institut fuer Sonnensystemforschung, Germany)

TL;DR
This study compares helioseismic flow measurements from MDI and HMI instruments, finding high correlation but systematically larger flow magnitudes from HMI, possibly due to formation depth differences.
Contribution
It demonstrates a method to extend helioseismic campaigns by harmonizing data from MDI and HMI, enabling consistent flow measurements across instruments.
Findings
HMI-derived flows are about 20% larger than MDI.
Flow measurements from both instruments are highly correlated.
Differences may be due to formation depth of Doppler signals.
Abstract
We study the possibility of consistent extension of MDI full-disc helioseismic campaigns with the growing data set of HMI observations. To do so, we down-sample and filter the HMI Dopplegrams so that the resulting spatial power spectrum is similar to the spatial power spectrum of MDI full-disc Dopplergrams. The set of co-spatial and co-temporal datacube pairs from both instruments containing no missing and no bad frames were processed using the same codes and inverted independently for all three components of the plasma flow in the near surface layers. The results from the two instruments are highly correlated, however systematically larger (by ~20%) flow magnitudes are derived from HMI. We comment that this may be an effect of the different formation depth of the Doppler signal
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
