The Neutrino Mass Hierarchy from Nuclear Reactor Experiments
Emilio Ciuffoli, Jarah Evslin, Xinmin Zhang

TL;DR
This study uses extensive simulations to evaluate how reactor neutrino experiments can determine the neutrino mass hierarchy, considering various factors like analysis methods, parameters, and baselines, and proposes solutions to analysis issues.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive simulation-based analysis of reactor neutrino experiments, identifying optimal configurations and addressing analysis biases for hierarchy determination.
Findings
Weighted Fourier transform removes spectral analysis bias.
Optimal baselines and detector locations are identified.
Reactor experiments can confidently determine the hierarchy despite degeneracies.
Abstract
10 years from now reactor neutrino experiments will attempt to determine which neutrino mass eigenstate is the most massive. In this letter we present the results of more than seven million detailed simulations of such experiments, studying the dependence of the probability of successfully determining the mass hierarchy upon the analysis method, the neutrino mass matrix parameters, reactor flux models, geoneutrinos and, in particular, combinations of baselines. We show that a recently reported spurious dependence of the data analysis upon the high energy tail of the reactor spectrum can be removed by using a weighted Fourier transform. We determine the optimal baselines and corresponding detector locations. For most values of the CP-violating, leptonic Dirac phase delta, a degeneracy prevents NOvA and T2K from determining either delta or the hierarchy. We determine the confidence with…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
