MAD with Aliens? Interstellar deterrence and its implications
Janne M. Korhonen

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the risks of interstellar conflict and deterrence, suggesting that attacks are unlikely due to rational decision-making, and that contact with ETIs may be relatively low-risk despite potential threats.
Contribution
It applies Cold War deterrence theory to interstellar scenarios, challenging assumptions about the hostility of extraterrestrial intelligences and assessing the risks of contact.
Findings
Unprovoked attacks on humanity are unlikely due to rational deterrence.
Interstellar conflicts are expected to be rare among civilizations.
Contact with ETIs may pose low risks, as deception and mutual caution are possible.
Abstract
The possibility that extraterrestrial intelligences (ETIs) could be hostile to humanity has been raised as a reason to avoid even trying to contact ETIs. However, there is a distinct shortage of analytical discussion about the risks of an attack, perhaps because of an implicit premise that we cannot analyze the decision making of an alien civilization. This paper argues that we can draw some inferences from the history of the Cold War and nuclear deterrence in order to show that at least some attack scenarios are likely to be exaggerated. In particular, it would seem to be unlikely that the humanity would be attacked simply because it might, some time in the future, present a threat to the ETI. Even if communication proves to be difficult, rational decision-makers should avoid unprovoked attacks, because their success would be very difficult to assure. In general, it seems believable…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
