XMM-Newton Observations of the TeV \gamma-ray Source HESS J1804-216
Dacheng Lin, Natalie A. Webb, Didier Barret (IRAP, France)

TL;DR
This study analyzed XMM-Newton observations of the TeV gamma-ray source HESS J1804-216, identifying likely X-ray counterparts and characterizing their properties, but found no direct evidence linking these sources to the TeV emission.
Contribution
First detailed X-ray analysis of HESS J1804-216's central region, identifying and characterizing potential counterparts and their properties.
Findings
Src 1 shows a 2.93 hr X-ray periodicity, likely an eclipsing polar.
Src 2 exhibits a strong Fe emission line and variability, probably an intermediate polar.
No clear extended X-ray emission linked to the supernova remnant G8.7-0.1 or the pulsar wind nebula PSR J1803-2137 was detected.
Abstract
We have analyzed three XMM-Newton observations of the central part of the unidentified TeV \gamma-ray source HESS J1804-216. We focus on two X-ray sources 2XMMi J180442.0-214221 (Src 1) and 2XMMi J180432.5-214009 (Src 2), which were suggested to be the possible X-ray counterparts to the TeV source. We discover a 2.93 hr X-ray periodicity from Src 1, with the pulse profile explained with a self-eclipsing pole in an eclipsing polar. Src 2 exhibits a strong Fe emission line (FWHM ~0.3 keV and equivalent width ~0.8 keV) and large X-ray variability on timescales of hours and is probably an intermediate polar. Thus Src 1 and Src 2 are probably two field sources not responsible for the TeV emission. The observations were contaminated by strong straylight from a nearby bright source, and we see no clear extended X-ray emission that can be attributed to the supernova remnant G8.7-0.1, a popular…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
