Is there evidence for additional neutrino species from cosmology?
Stephen M. Feeney, Hiranya V. Peiris, Licia Verde

TL;DR
This paper uses Bayesian model selection on current cosmological data to evaluate evidence for additional neutrino species beyond the Standard Model, finding no strong support for such extensions.
Contribution
It applies Bayesian analysis to a comprehensive set of cosmological datasets to assess the necessity of extra neutrino flavors, considering various extensions and degeneracies.
Findings
Current data do not require additional neutrino species.
Bayesian evidence favors the standard three neutrino model.
Extensions like massive neutrinos are not strongly supported.
Abstract
It has been suggested that recent cosmological and flavor-oscillation data favor the existence of additional neutrino species beyond the three predicted by the Standard Model of particle physics. We apply Bayesian model selection to determine whether there is indeed any evidence from current cosmological datasets for the standard cosmological model to be extended to include additional neutrino flavors. The datasets employed include cosmic microwave background temperature, polarization and lensing power spectra, and measurements of the baryon acoustic oscillation scale and the Hubble constant. We also consider other extensions to the standard neutrino model, such as massive neutrinos, and possible degeneracies with other cosmological parameters. The Bayesian evidence indicates that current cosmological data do not require any non-standard neutrino properties.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
