On the Discrepancy between Theoretical and X-Ray Concentration-Mass Relations for Galaxy Clusters
Elena Rasia, Stefano Borgani, Stefano Ettori, Pasquale Mazzotta,, Massimo Meneghetti

TL;DR
This study investigates the discrepancies between theoretical and X-ray derived concentration-mass relations for galaxy clusters, analyzing simulation and observational methods to identify factors influencing these differences.
Contribution
It systematically examines how analysis methods, baryonic physics, and selection effects impact the observed and simulated concentration-mass relations.
Findings
X-ray approach and selection functions significantly affect the relation.
Radial range and baryonic physics have minor effects.
Discrepancies can be alleviated by considering observational biases.
Abstract
[Abridged] In the past 15 years, the concentration-mass relation has been investigated diffusely in theoretical studies. On the other hand, only recently has this relation been derived from X-ray observations. When that happened, the results caused a certain level of concern: the X-ray normalizations and slopes were found significantly dissimilar from those predicted by theory. We analyzed 52 objects, simulated each time with different physical recipes for the baryonic component, as well as 60 synthetic X-ray images, to determine if these discrepancies are real or artificial. In particular, we investigate how the simulated concentration-mass relation depends (1) on the radial range used to derive the concentration, (2) on the presence of baryons in the simulations, and on the prescription used to reproduce the gas. Finally, we evaluate (3) how the results differ when adopting an X-ray…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
