System size dependence of transverse momentum correlations at $\sqrt{s_{NN}}=$ 62.4 and 200 GeV at the BNL Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider
STAR Collaboration: L. Adamczyk, J. K. Adkins, G. Agakishiev, M. M., Aggarwal, Z. Ahammed, I. Alekseev, J. Alford, C. D. Anson, A. Aparin, D., Arkhipkin, E. Aschenauer, G. S. Averichev, J. Balewski, A. Banerjee, Z., Barnovska, D. R. Beavis, R. Bellwied, M. J. Betancourt

TL;DR
This study investigates how transverse momentum fluctuations and correlations vary with system size and collision energy in heavy-ion collisions, revealing independence from energy and system size and favoring transport models.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of $p_t$ correlations across different system sizes and energies, highlighting the role of transport processes over jetlike correlations.
Findings
$p_t$ correlations scaled by mean $p_t$ are energy and system size independent.
Transport models better match the experimental data than jet-based models.
Correlation results vary with collision centrality, $p_t$, $ heta$, and $ ext{azimuthal angle}$.
Abstract
We present a study of the average transverse momentum () fluctuations and correlations for charged particles produced in Cu+Cu collisions at midrapidity for 62.4 and 200 GeV. These results are compared with those published for Au+Au collisions at the same energies, to explore the system size dependence. In addition to the collision energy and system size dependence, the correlation results have been studied as functions of the collision centralities, the ranges in , the pseudorapidity , and the azimuthal angle . The square root of the measured correlations when scaled by mean is found to be independent of both colliding beam energy and system size studied. Transport-based model calculations are found to have a better quantitative agreement with the measurements compared to models which incorporate only jetlike correlations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
