Phase Errors in Diffraction-Limited Imaging: Contrast Limits for Sparse Aperture Masking
Michael J. Ireland

TL;DR
This paper develops formulae to understand phase errors in sparse aperture masking imaging, revealing current observational limits and proposing calibration strategies to improve high-contrast imaging near the diffraction limit.
Contribution
It introduces detailed formulae for third-order phase errors in SAM and kernel-phase techniques, aiding in understanding and mitigating contrast limitations in high-resolution imaging.
Findings
Current observations are limited by temporal phase noise and photon noise.
Formulations enable comparison of phase errors with fundamental noise sources.
Calibration strategies like POISE improve kernel-phase accuracy.
Abstract
Bispectrum phase, closure phase and their generalisation to kernel-phase are all independent of pupil-plane phase errors to first-order. This property, when used with Sparse Aperture Masking (SAM) behind adaptive optics, has been used recently in high-contrast observations at or inside the formal diffraction limit of large telescopes. Finding the limitations to these techniques requires an understanding of spatial and temporal third-order phase effects, as well as effects such as time-variable dispersion when coupled with the non-zero bandwidths in real observations. In this paper, formulae describing many of these errors are developed, so that a comparison can be made to fundamental noise processes of photon- and background-noise. I show that the current generation of aperture-masking observations of young solar-type stars, taken carefully in excellent observing conditions, are…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
