The different varieties of the Suyama-Yamaguchi consistency relation and its violation as a signal of statistical inhomogeneity
Yeinzon Rodriguez (1,2,3), Juan P. Beltran Almeida (1), Cesar A., Valenzuela-Toledo (4) ((1) Centro de Investigaciones Universidad Antonio, Narino, (2) Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics Kyoto University, (3), Escuela de Fisica Universidad Industrial de Santander

TL;DR
This paper explores various forms of the Suyama-Yamaguchi consistency relation in cosmology, identifying conditions under which they hold or are violated, especially in models involving non-trivial degrees of freedom like vector fields.
Contribution
It clarifies the conditions for the validity of different Suyama-Yamaguchi relation variants and demonstrates potential violations in models with vector fields, impacting cosmological tests.
Findings
The fifth variety of the SY relation is always satisfied under statistical homogeneity.
The fourth variety can be strongly violated in models with vector fields.
Violations of these relations can challenge the foundations of cosmological inference.
Abstract
We present the different consistency relations that can be seen as variations of the well known Suyama-Yamaguchi (SY) consistency relation \tau_{NL} \geqslant ((6/5) f_{NL})^2. It has been claimed that the following variation: \tau_{NL} ({\bf k}_1, {\bf k_3}) \geqslant (6/5)^2 f_{NL} ({\bf k}_1) f_{NL} ({\bf k}_3), which we call "the fourth variety", in the collapsed (for \tau_{NL}) and squeezed (for f_{NL}) limits is always satisfied independently of any physics; however, the proof depends sensitively on the assumption of scale-invariance which only applies for cosmological models involving Lorentz-invariant scalar fields (at least at tree level), leaving room for a strong violation of this variety of the consistency relation when non-trivial degrees of freedom, for instance vector fields, are in charge of the generation of \zeta. With this in mind as a motivation, we explicitly state…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
