When Generalized Sumsets are Difference Dominated
Virginia Hogan, Steven J. Miller

TL;DR
This paper investigates how the number of minus signs in generalized sumsets affects their size, revealing a phase transition in behavior depending on the probability of element inclusion as the set size grows.
Contribution
It extends previous work by analyzing the size relationship of sumsets with varying minus signs under different element inclusion probabilities, especially when this probability tends to zero.
Findings
Set with more minus signs is larger with probability 1 for certain p(N)
Identifies a phase transition at δ = (h-1)/h in the behavior of sumset sizes
Generalizes earlier results by Hegarty and Miller
Abstract
We study the relationship between the number of minus signs in a generalized sumset, , and its cardinality; without loss of generality we may assume there are at least as many positive signs as negative signs. As addition is commutative and subtraction is not, we expect that for most a combination with more minus signs has more elements than one with fewer; however, recently Iyer, Lazarev, Miller and Zhang proved that a positive percentage of the time the combination with fewer minus signs can have more elements. Their analysis involves choosing sets uniformly at random from ; this is equivalent to independently choosing each element of to be in with probability 1/2. We investigate what happens when instead each element is chosen with probability , with . We prove that the set with more minus signs is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsLimits and Structures in Graph Theory · Advanced Topology and Set Theory · Graph theory and applications
