When is tit-for-tat unbeatable?
Peter Duersch, Joerg Oechssler, Burkhard C. Schipper

TL;DR
This paper characterizes the class of symmetric two-player games where tit-for-tat and similar imitation strategies are unbeatable, identifying exact potential games as the key setting where these strategies are effective.
Contribution
It establishes that tit-for-tat and related imitation rules are essentially unbeatable in exact potential games, covering a wide range of common game types.
Findings
Tit-for-tat is unbeatable in exact potential games.
Includes a broad class of imitation rules like imitate-the-best.
Applicable to many standard game models such as Cournot, price competition, and public goods.
Abstract
We characterize the class of symmetric two-player games in which tit-for-tat cannot be beaten even by very sophisticated opponents in a repeated game. It turns out to be the class of exact potential games. More generally, there is a class of simple imitation rules that includes tit-for-tat but also imitate-the-best and imitate-if-better. Every decision rule in this class is essentially unbeatable in exact potential games. Our results apply to many interesting games including all symmetric 2x2 games, and standard examples of Cournot duopoly, price competition, public goods games, common pool resource games, and minimum effort coordination games.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGame Theory and Applications · Economic theories and models · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
