Statistical testing of shared genetic control for potentially related traits
Chris Wallace

TL;DR
This paper evaluates statistical methods for colocalisation testing of genetic regions across traits, highlighting the impact of SNP selection on error rates and proposing improved approaches for accurate analysis.
Contribution
It demonstrates that avoiding SNP selection bias and using Bayesian model averaging improves control of type 1 error in colocalisation tests, facilitating better analysis of shared genetic factors.
Findings
SNP selection method greatly influences error rates
Bayesian model averaging improves error control
Shared genetic signatures identified across related diseases
Abstract
Integration of data from genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) association studies of different traits should allow researchers to disentangle the genetics of potentially related traits within individually associated regions. Formal statistical colocalisation testing of individual regions, which requires selection of a set of SNPs summarizing the association in a region. We show that the SNP selection method greatly affects type 1 error rates, with published studies having used methods expected to result in substantially inflated type 1 error rates. We show that either avoiding variable selection and instead testing the most informative principal components or integrating over variable selection using Bayesian model averaging can lead to correct control of type 1 error rates. Application to data from Graves' disease and Hashimoto's thyroiditis reveals a common genetic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
