Analysis of the resonant components in B0->J/\psi pi+pi-
LHCb collaboration: R. Aaij, C. Abellan Beteta, A. Adametz, B. Adeva,, M. Adinolfi, C. Adrover, A. Affolder, Z. Ajaltouni, J. Albrecht, F. Alessio,, M. Alexander, S. Ali, G. Alkhazov, P. Alvarez Cartelle, A. A. Alves Jr, S., Amato, Y. Amhis, L. Anderlini, J. Anderson

TL;DR
This paper investigates the resonant components in B0->J/psi pi+pi- decays to improve understanding of CP violation effects, providing new measurements of decay fractions, resonance contributions, and setting limits on f0(980) resonance production.
Contribution
It presents the first detailed analysis of the final state composition in B0->J/psi pi+pi- decays, including resonance identification and upper limits on f0(980) production, enhancing CP violation studies.
Findings
Significant production of f0(500) and rho(770) resonances was observed.
No evidence for f0(980) resonance was found, setting an upper limit on its production.
Measured the branching fraction of B0->J/psi pi+pi- as (3.97 +/-0.09+/- 0.11 +/- 0.16)x10^{-5}.
Abstract
Interpretation of CP violation measurements using charmonium decays, in both the B0 and Bs systems, can be subject to changes due to "penguin" type diagrams. These effects can be investigated using measurements of the Cabibbo-suppressed B0->J/\psi pi+pi- decays. The final state composition of this channel is investigated using a 1.0/fb sample of data produced in 7 TeV pp collisions at the LHC and collected by the LHCb experiment. A modified Dalitz plot analysis is performed using both the invariant mass spectra and the decay angular distributions. An improved measurement of the B0->J/\psi pi+pi- branching fraction of (3.97 +/-0.09+/- 0.11 +/- 0.16)x10^{-5} is reported where the first uncertainty is statistical, the second is systematic and the third is due to the uncertainty of the branching fraction of the decay B- -> J/\psi K- used as a normalization channel. In the J/\psi pi+pi-…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
