MaGICC Thick Disk I: Comparing a Simulated Disk Formed with Stellar Feedback to the Milky Way
G. S. Stinson (1), J. Bovy (2), H.-W. Rix (1), C. Brook (3), R., Ro\v{s}kar (4), J. J. Dalcanton (5), A. V. Macci\`o (1), J. Wadsley (6), H., M. P. Couchman (6), T. R. Quinn (5), ((1) MPIA, (2) IAS, (3) UA Madrid, (4), Zurich, (5) U of Washington, (6) McMaster)

TL;DR
This study compares a cosmological simulation of a Milky Way-like galaxy with actual observations, focusing on structure and chemical properties, revealing both similarities and differences such as a notably thicker disk in the simulation.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison between simulated and observed galactic disks, validating some observational proxies and highlighting differences like the very thick disk in the simulation.
Findings
Simulated galaxy has a thick disk (~1.5 kpc) not seen in the Milky Way.
Qualitative agreement in age and metallicity distributions between simulation and observations.
Mono-abundance populations are good proxies for age in most cases.
Abstract
We analyse the structure and chemical enrichment of a Milky Way-like galaxy with a stellar mass of 2 10^{10} M_sun, formed in a cosmological hydrodynamical simulation. It is disk-dominated with a flat rotation curve, and has a disk scale length similar to the Milky Way's, but a velocity dispersion that is ~50% higher. Examining stars in narrow [Fe/H] and [\alpha/Fe] abundance ranges, we find remarkable qualitative agreement between this simulation and observations: a) The old stars lie in a thickened distribution with a short scale length, while the young stars form a thinner disk, with scale lengths decreasing, as [Fe/H] increases. b) Consequently, there is a distinct outward metallicity gradient. c) Mono-abundance populations exist with a continuous distribution of scale heights (from thin to thick). However, the simulated galaxy has a distinct and substantive very thick disk (h_z~1.5…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
